Mencken, thou shouldst be living at this hour

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Sun Sep 1 10:34:11 PDT 2002


Chip Berlet recommended:


>http://tentmaker.org/articles/The-Touchstoning_of_Americas_Heart.htm

...where one reads an unsurprising critique of the filth purveyed by Hollywood (with which some Z writers might be in partial agreement!), but also a critique of imperialism and greed and:


>What the United States of America needs right now is not to start
>another war, this one a "War on Terrorism." This is NOT a time to
>wave the nationalistic pride flag, especially for Christians who
>live in America. What it desperately needs first is a long, deep,
>reflective time to look at a side of itself that it has been
>unwilling to look at. This present time is no time to be dropping
>bombs on our perceived enemies - it is a time to rend our hearts -
>to turn within - and to wrestle with the American conscience. It is
>time for a wrestling match like Jacob had at Peniel.

...and...


>President George Bush may be "conservative," but he is NOT as
>"compassionate" as his public relations team paints him. George Bush
>is a Law-man, not a Love-man. He does not know the difference
>between the Law of the LIFE in Christ Jesus and the Law of Moses.
>The theology he has been taught has mixed them both together and the
>end result of such a mixture is death. His state, Texas, puts more
>prisoners to death than any state in America.

...and...


>The main reason so many millions of Christians are being deceived
>into following ways and people that bring destruction rather than
>the healing power of New Testament Christianity is because modern
>Western Christianity is a noxious mixture of Mosaic Law and a little
>bit of grace. Christians seem to be oblivious to the fact that James
>made it quite clear that anyone who attempted to keep a portion of
>the Mosaic Law was obligated to keep it all. And if one failed in a
>single point of that law, the penalty was DEATH. This is the reason
>why much of the church looks dead - that's because it IS dead,
>spiritually speaking.

The writer's prescription is reminiscent of, who was it, Alice Walker's maybe, widely mocked prescription that the response to 9/11 should have been love not vengeance.

So we have something a bit more complicated than standard issue Bible-thumping lunacy, and not the sort of armed millenarianism the Economist article was talking about. So what do you make of it, Chip? Is this kind of thinking widespread?

Doug



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list