a critique of the march on Sandton

[n/ a]

>But, my point was that, too often it seems, much of the anarchist 
>"critique"
>seems to be criticism in the negative without posing any theory-- let alone
>praxis-- in the positive. Thus it seems that a lot of far-left posturing is
>going on without any substantive discussion on what should be done.

For me, as someone who is actually involved in the anarchist movement, I 
don't see any of this criticism without the positive suggestion of theory 
going on. There are volumes upon volumes of anarchist theory that is very 
closely inrerwoven with practice, both historical and present. Could you 
give us some examples? If you are somehow unsure about some aspect of 
anarchist theory, please speak up and I could doubtless direct you to a 
myriad of literary resources [possibly even living organisations] that could 
answer your queries in full.

In short, anarchism has always engaged in substantive discussion on what 
should be done.

Paul

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com