dangerous men

[Wojtek Sokolowski]

At 11:00 AM 9/9/2002 -0700, joanna wrote:
>At 03:58 PM 09/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>>Please define term "dangerous man." Proclivity to cheat? Violent history?
>>Cool-looking leather jacket? Years of experience working in high-radiation
>>areas?
>
>Yeah, what I was thinking of was definitely NOT physically violent "macho" 
>men -- I could always see throught that. I think I meant something more 
>like "jerks" -- the kind your mother can see coming a mile away. So, 
>something more like, self-centered, immature, inconsiderate, and 
>aggressive in the sense of very confident (given their immaturity).
>

In a word, a jock.  Difficult to describe but you know exactly who they are 
when you see them.  They are always popular with high school girls and 
women who do not advance beyond that mental stage.  Which further supports 
my "sheeple" behavioral model (i.e. people doing what is conventionally 
expected).  Jocks epitomize the conventional gender roles, as opposed to 
nerds and others outcasts and weirdos.  That explains the choice made by 
most HS girls - as teenage behavior is driven mostly by following the herd 
and conformity to conventional rules of the herd.

wojtek