> Nazis were the original globalists, and all globalists today are their
> heirs, and nationalism is the only defense of freedom. Which I admit
> sounds kind of silly in one sentence like that, and may well be mad for
> all I know. But he's not stupid and he writes well and his individual
> articles on the ICC are interesting (which is all I've ever read by him).
> I was wondering if anyone could supply any context for where he fits in in
> the world. His ICC articles have been published by both the Guardian and
> the WSJ.
>
> Michael
>
>