Saddam's successors?

Michael Pugliese debsian at pacbell.net
Tue Sep 24 11:03:45 PDT 2002


http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=321252 Iraq chose Saddam for good reason. The West needs a history lesson Phillip Knightley, The Independent, August 4, 2002

Before Tony Blair joins the new crusaders trying to impose a "regime change", a Western "settlement" on Iraq, he should at least look at the historical facts that explain the rise of nationalist leaders such as Saddam Hussein. And while he is at it, since he is good at empathy, he might try looking at Britain through Iraqi eyes. Seen from Baghdad, the British have bombed and invaded their country, lied to them, manipulated their borders, imposed on them leaders they did not want, kidnapped ones they did, fixed their elections, used collective terror tactics on their civilians, promised them freedom and then planned to turn their country into a province of India populated by immigrant Punjabi farmers. Small wonder that the author Said Aburish said to me recently: "If you think Saddam Hussein is a hard man to deal with, just wait for the next generation of Iraqi leaders."

Found via, " Alternative Perspectives on the ''War on Terrorism'' and the Middle East Conflict, " http://warincontext.org/

http://www.zmag.org/aburishiraq.htm , "A tale of 70 factions and 400 suits, " by Said Aburish

Where is the opposition in Iraq? Pursuing its own vicious quarrels, writes Said Aburish... <snip> posted here before.

Michael Pugliese



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list