<P> Help me out here, and I am not being a smart ass. But, isn't the point behind "marxism" that it is inevitable? And if so, isn;t the issue a matter or "when," not "if?"
<P>thanks
<P> <B><I>Carrol Cox <cbcox@ilstu.edu></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">A professor at Northern Michigan College in 1959 had this term paper on<BR>Marx submitted which he suspected from the first page was plagiarized.<BR>The source became clear when the paper concluded by saying something<BR>like "But so far his thought has had no practical consequenses." It was<BR>plagiarized from a 1905 encyclopedia.<BR><BR>It would be better if the name of the movement was simply 'socialism"<BR>rather than "marxism," but given that we are caught with the name, it is<BR>a bit presumptuous to predice too certainly what the the future of the<BR>"marxist movement" will be.<BR><BR>Carrol</BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://shopping.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Shopping</a> - Mother's Day is May 12th!