<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1255"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff><FONT face=Arial size=2> <P><FONT face="Arial Black">Why Economic Boycott -- A reply to an Israeli comrade</FONT></P> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">by Tanya Reinhart in Indymedia Israel</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">Prof. Reinhart replys to a letter written by Prof. Baruch Kimmerling, in Ha'aretz, stating his objection to any academic boycott against Israel.  </FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">Tanya is one of the major Israeli academic signitories in favor of the boycott.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">Below is a much shortened version of her letter, to give you some of the main arguments.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">The whole article is at:<BR><A href="http://www.indymedia.org.il/imc/israel/webcast/27741.html">http://www.indymedia.org.il/imc/israel/webcast/27741.html</A></FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">--------------------------------------------</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">Dear Baruch Kimmerling,</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">Last week, you published in Ha'aretz a moving letter defending the freedom of expression of a group of Israeli professors, including myself, who signed a European petition calling for a moratorium on European support to the Israeli academia. Here is what you wrote:</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">"The Coordinating Council of the Faculty Associations [of the Israeli universities] issued a public statement, which appeared in Ha'aretz on May 6, denouncing the call of scientists in Europe and North America to declare a boycott on the Israeli academia, following... supposed war crimes that the State of Israel committed in the occupied territories. </FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">As someone who acted immediately and actively against this boycott, because I saw this as a blatant violation of academic freedom, which is the essence of academic research and teaching, I was shocked by this statement. The shock stems from the content of the document, which not only denounces the boycott, but also denounces that minority of the Israeli academic personnel that support the proposed boycott.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">For precisely the same reason that one should oppose the boycott, one should oppose the    denouncement of academic members who think differently. Instead of insisting on the      freedom of speech and thought of all its members, the council launched an attack on      this freedom.... I demand the immediate resignation of those responsible for this      outrageous public statement."</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">In the present climate in Israel, it is comforting, and far from trivial, to hear voices still defending old fashioned ideas like freedom of speech. For this reason, I appreciate your letter. Nevertheless, I would like to explain here why your defense still leaves me utterly unmoved.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">...</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">I am not sure whether your objections to the moratorium on research funds to the Israeli academia, which we called for, is because you object to any divestment or boycott moves, or whether you think the academia should be exempt. Many Israeli academics hold the latter view, so I suppose it is also yours. You say in your letter that the reason you "acted immediately and actively against this boycott" is "because I saw this as a blatant violation of academic freedom, which is the essence of academic research and teaching." This is a very peculiar use of the concept of academic freedom. What is under consideration here is your freedom to access international research funds. You seem to view this type of freedom as an inalienable right, untouchable by any considerations of the international community regarding the context in which its funds are used. But it is not. The traditional spirit of the academia, no matter how much of it is preserved in daily practice, is that intellectual responsibility includes the safeguarding of moral principles. The international academic community has the full right to decide that it does not support institutions of societies which divert blatantly from such principles. You had no problem accepting this when South Africa was concerned.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">The only question is whether there is anything about the Israeli academia (as an institution, unlike individual resisting academics) that could exempt it from the condemnation and pressure of the international community. Let us turn to the broader arsenal of the arguments used to argue that. You find yourself here in large company. The Israeli academia, which was not so impressed with mere condemnations and the ongoing ban on official academic events in Israel, got on its feet when its freedom to access international funds was at stake. In a matter of days, they organized a counter petition (to the British petition above), which has gathered thousands of signatures. Dr. Ben Avot, one of the organizers of the counter petition "says that 'the signatories come from a wide array of opinions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, ranging from members of [the right-wing] 'Professors for National Strength' to people who are usually identified with the left, such as Prof. Baruch Kimmerling'" (Traubman, Ha'aretz, ibid.).</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">A basic principle that the counter-petition you signed is based on, is that science should always be separated from politics. It is this line which enabled the Israeli academia to live in peace with the occupation for thirty five years. Never in its history did the senate of any Israeli university pass a resolution protesting the frequent closure of Palestinian universities, let alone voice protest the devastation sowed there during the last uprising. (Such resolution would be a violation of the sacred principle of separation -- more examples of this below.) If in extreme situations of violations of human rights and moral principles, the academia refuses to criticize and take a side, it collaborates with the oppressing system. But as we saw, it is precisely this principle, and the collaboration that it entails, which the international community is now condemning.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">...</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">The colonialists were always certain that they are bringing progress to the natives. Here is what Prof. Rita Giacaman of Birzeit University told me about the matter: "Several individually linked projects began with Israelis since the Oslo accords were signed, mainly because Europe and the US were luring scientists with the carrot of money in a money starved environment, in exchange for being used as 'evidence' for peace and equity having been achieved, when the stick never stopped hitting Palestinian infrastructure, institutions, political processes and academic life. It thus placed us in the political arena, using us to show peace that does not exist and equity that exists even less. Many of us Palestinian academics chose not to get involved in such academic cooperative relations with Israelis and continued solidarity activities [with Israelis], aimed at changing the political reality instead -the root cause of the problem. .. Anyway, the issue is not about Israeli scientists helping out. This is like taking away the right of villagers to till their land and then giving them some food-aid instead. The issue is ending occupation and allowing Palestinian to develop their institutions, including scientific ones." (Personal communication, May 2002).</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black">If continuing support to the Israeli academia is what the Palestinian academia considers best for its future, we should hear it from them. What I hear from my comrades in the Palestinian academia is only a full and unequivocal support for the boycott. </FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial Black"><BR></FONT></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>