<P> I am not an expert, but isn't Kimel about the scope of Congress's power? From which state immunity followed. Now, I am all aboard if we are taling about the Court's Section 5 14th Amendment jurisprudence. That is what I thought ultimately determined the outcome in Kimel. Again I am not an expert Justin, so this is not a gotcha kind of question.
<P> <B><I>Justin Schwartz <jkschw@hotmail.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR><BR>><BR>><BR>>What case held what you wrote below?<BR>> Justin Schwartz <JKSCHW@HOTMAIL.COM>wrote:<BR>><BR>>No, it'sdangerous because the states should not be constitutionally free to<BR>>discriminate on the basis of age<BR><BR>Kimel<BR><BR>>or disability,<BR><BR>Garrett<BR><BR>>or pay substandard wages,<BR><BR>This is a mistake, I misremembered the holding of Garcia.<BR><BR><BR>jks<BR><BR>_________________________________________________________________<BR>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en/spl">Sign-up for Video Highlights</a> of 2002 FIFA World Cup