<P> as a libertarian, I think he would be predisposed to the notion of self-rule, but hey what do I know? Plus, even if there are "no Palestineans," don't they have the "right' to overthrow the shackles of a repressive rights-denying regime, ala the "American Revolution?" Just a thought.
<P> <B><I>"Max B. Sawicky" <sawicky@bellatlantic.net></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Boundless ignorance? Since he's a libertarian of sorts,<BR>she could ask what he makes of Israeli law forbidding<BR>sale of land to Palestinians. Or how he justifies<BR>the addition of 190,000 settlers to occupied territory.<BR>Or what he makes of a proven war criminal as head of state<BR>(a status Sharon had well-established well before the<BR>refugee camp massacres).<BR><BR>mbs<BR><BR><BR>This appears to be Maher's worst topic. I saw him on Larry King claiming<BR>that "there are no such things as Palestinians" and generally placing<BR>himself to the right of Ariel Sharon on Palestinian rights. I don't like<BR>Maher in general, but can anyone offer insight as to why he's especially<BR>such an ass on this issue?<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en/spl">Sign-up for Video Highlights</a> of 2002 FIFA World Cup