<P> what is the basis for the prohibition of posting full articles? Despite being a lawyer, I have no idea. Especially when the list is not a public list (though if the archives are available to the public, then maybe that changes things)
<P>eric
<P> <B><I>Doug Henwood <dhenwood@panix.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Chuck Grimes wrote:<BR><BR>><BR>>Here's a hoax letter from a guy claiming to represent TIME, sent to<BR>>the admin of utah.edu-supported listservs (I presume the same guy<BR>>sent one to Marco). Yoshie<BR>><BR>>----------<BR>><BR>>Oh, come on.<BR>><BR>>There's got to be better than that around. If it's just spam, its no<BR>>threat. There has to be more going here.<BR><BR>That's a very close replica of the one that Marco & I got. I was <BR>ready to fold, but Marco questioned his identity and turned out to be <BR>right.<BR><BR>Mostly I post the full text of stuff that's short (one screen of <BR>text), or available only with subscription; otherwise, a summary or <BR>opening paragraph plus URL is best. If the copyright owners complain, <BR>we can take it out of the archives.<BR><BR>Doug</BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en/spl">Sign-up for Video Highlights</a> of 2002 FIFA World Cup