<P> If I remember right, Posner thinks that the government should be the <STRONG>recipient</STRONG> of all punitive damage awards.
<P> <B><I>Justin Schwartz <jkschw@hotmail.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>>><BR>>>Government agencies can be forced to pay actual damages but not punitive<BR>>>damages for<BR>>>violating a landmark disabilities law, the court ruled.<BR>><BR>><BR>>Why is punitive damages paid by government agencies a good thing? It is<BR>>invariably a transfer of public tax monies to private pockets. Very much<BR>>different from punitive damages paid by private parties, which usually have<BR>>a re-distributive aspect.<BR>><BR>>wojtek<BR>><BR><BR>The point is not compensation or redistribution but punishment, to say BAD <BR>state actor, Don't Do That! Sometimes it's the only thing that gets their <BR>attention.<BR><BR>jks<BR><BR><BR>_________________________________________________________________<BR>Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. <BR>http://www.hotmail.com<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do Yo!
u !
Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en/spl">Sign-up for Video Highlights</a> of 2002 FIFA World Cup