<P> yes but the exact form the rule of law takes will depend on the particular end of the decision maker. I will post more on this later, but Scalia's conception of the rule of law differs from Posner differs from Brennan and the differ because of their disagrteement as to hunman nature and the forms of government dervied from there
<P> <B><I>Justin Schwartz <jkschw@hotmail.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>><BR>>So what kind of law or state is supposed to rule over the Karamazovs, or <BR>>for<BR>>that matter the Dorkins, the Coxs, the Browns, the Grimes', the Murrays, <BR>>the<BR>>Furuhashis', the Sokolowslis, the Schwartzs?<BR>><BR><BR>A liberal state premised on the fact of fundamental disagreement about ends, <BR>and based on the rule of law--is that so hard?<BR><BR>jks<BR><BR>_________________________________________________________________<BR>Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. <BR>http://www.hotmail.com<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en/spl">Sign-up for Video Highlights</a> of 2002 FIFA World Cup