<P> Heck, you and I alone in a room can't even meet that criteria....coercion is a first choice solution, though the form of its arguments and punishments are where the debate really lies.
<P> <B><I>dave dorkin <ddorkin1@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Let's put it this way: small groups of uncoerced<BR>actors engaging in unalienated ideal speech situations<BR>may be able to come up with something better-do I<BR>think this probable or possible? Let's just say<BR>coercion can be a nice second best solution for thew<BR>world in which I live :)<BR><BR>Dave<BR><BR><BR>> I'm sure you didn't mean to write this: "I remain<BR>> agnostic as to whether<BR>> must be true everywhere"; whatever you intended got<BR>> lost before it<BR>> reached your fingers. :-)<BR>> <BR>> Carrol<BR><BR><BR>__________________________________________________<BR>Do You Yahoo!?<BR>LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience<BR>http://launch.yahoo.com</BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en/spl">Sign-up for Video Highlights</a> of 2002 FIFA World Cup