<html>
nathan unless someone else is using your name, your article made it to
the SmirkingChimp<br>
<a href="http://www.smirkingchimp.com/article.php?sid=7353&mode=nested&order=0" eudora="autourl">http://www.smirkingchimp.com/article.php?sid=7353&mode=nested&order=0</a><br><br>
<br>
<b>Nathan Newman: 'GOP tries to pin Enron/WorldCom on Clinton'<br>
</b>Posted on Sunday, July 14 @ 09:20:17 EDT <br><br>
<i>By Nathan Newman, <font color="#0000FF"><u>Progressive
Populist<br><br>
</u></i></font>Well, you can see the rightwing talking points in motion,
as telepundits and rightwing scribblers now mouth the mantra &emdash;
Clinton's lying about a blowjob led corporations to think it was okay to
defraud the public and encourage trillions of dollars in phantom
speculation. <br><br>
Now, Clinton was too soft on corporate interests in a number of
instances, particularly in trade deals, but on this issue, Clinton does
not deserve the abuse. In fact, he deserves praise for fighting during
his presidency against the brokerage fraud and auditors lobby.<br><br>
Aside from the silliness of the GOP line (and the echo of Newt Gingrich's
sociological explanation that liberalism led to that South Carolina
mother deliberately driving her kids into a lake to their death a few
years ago), it's just a way for the Republicans to cover up their own
sins.<br><br>
cont.<br><br>
</html>