<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/14/2002 11:01:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, peterk@enteract.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">The experiment in Sweden didn't go so well. Unions need to invest<BR>
their money in worthwhile candidates, not losers like Clinton. I saw<BR>
a Green rally on TV the other night and Nader's calling for the<BR>
repeal of Taft-Hartley!<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Peter, can you elaborate on Sweden? <BR>
Given the added problems workers face with their savings going down the toilet, now is a good time for union leaders to get more vocal about repeal, instead of having closed door meetings with the likes of Goldman Sachs CEO Hank Paulson (who in a speech last year called 'corporate globalization a major profit opportunity for Goldman'). Nader's been rightly calling for the repeal of Taft-Hartley for years.<BR>
<BR>
Nomi</FONT></HTML>