<html>
isn't this just swell. nothing like an article about fascism
to make one's day.<br>
<br>
R<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>NY Times<br>
August 23, 2002<br>
<b>Shaming Young Mothers<br>
</b><br>
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF<br>
<br>
Do you want to know about the sex life of Sandra, a 33-year-old
brunette<br>
in Tampa?<br>
<br>
Just read the Florida newspapers. Sandra is being forced by Florida<br>
state law to buy advertisements that give her full name (which I'm
not<br>
repeating) and physical description: 5 feet 2 inches, 142 pounds,
brown<br>
eyes. Then, as the law requires, she has to list and describe the
five<br>
men she had sex with late last summer: Bill, Tommy, Allen, Eric and<br>
Joshua.<br>
<br>
This new state law requires women — even 14- and 15-year-old girls,
even<br>
rape victims — to disclose the name and address of the father of a
baby<br>
offered for adoption, or else to publish these ads for four weeks.<br>
Perhaps not since a tribal council in Pakistan ordered a woman to
be<br>
gang-raped in June has a government treated women with such
contempt.<br>
<br>
The new Florida law was meant to reduce the risk of a father's
emerging<br>
years after an adoption and seeking custody. So the law stipulates
that<br>
the mother must publish her name and description, along with the
names<br>
and descriptions of men whom she cannot locate but with whom she had
sex<br>
around the time of conception.<br>
<br>
"It's extremely humiliating," said Melissa Colleran, a
pregnant<br>
18-year-old New Yorker now living in Florida and planning to give
her<br>
baby up for adoption. Ms. Colleran doesn't know where the father is
but<br>
is pretty sure he won't be happy at seeing his name in the
newspaper.</blockquote><br>
<br>
if you can stand reading more about this crime against women and nature,
here's the site:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/23/opinion/23KRIS.html" eudora="autourl">http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/23/opinion/23KRIS.html</a><br>
</html>