<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>Does that mean the court would also hear a petition to ban
<BR>
<BR>1. websites full of statistics that are so wrong as to be obscene?
<BR>
<BR>2. Media outlets whose misinformation is also so egregious as to be obscene?
<BR>
<BR>Thinking of a list of the above could be FUN! ;/-)))))
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>DoreneC
<BR>
<BR>In a message dated 10/1/02 7:07:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, qualiall@union.org.za writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj: <B>Anti WTO, IMF sites could be banned in Oz</B>
<BR>Date: 10/1/02 7:07:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time
<BR>From: qualiall@union.org.za (Kevin Robert Dean)
<BR>Sender: owner-lbo-talk@lists.panix.com
<BR>Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:lbo-talk@lists.panix.com">lbo-talk@lists.panix.com</A>
<BR>To: lbo-talk@lists.panix.com
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>Secret web bans in FOI amendments
<BR>Simon Hayes
<BR>October 01, 2002
<BR>
<BR>WEBSITES protesting against November's World Trade
<BR>Organisation meeting in Sydney could be secretly banned
<BR>under proposed laws.
<BR>
<BR>Several websites that call for violent disruption of the
<BR>informal WTO summit have been targeted by NSW Police
<BR>Minister Michael Costa, who has referred them for possible
<BR>banning under federal internet censorship rules designed to
<BR>rein in online pornography.
<BR>Full:
<BR>http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5200940%255E15306,00.html
<BR>---
<BR>Sent from UnionMail Service [http://mail.union.org.za]
<BR>
<BR></FONT></HTML>