<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4916.2300" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I love the way ellsberg just picks apart the smear
attempts...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>steve</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>www.ellsberg.net</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><A
href="http://ellsberg.net/weblog/10_19_02.htm">http://ellsberg.net/weblog/10_19_02.htm</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><EM>Transcript of Ellsberg on CNN Newsnight with Aaron Brown, 10/18/02</EM>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B><BR></B></FONT><FONT
color=#000000><B>BROWN: </B>We came across some quotes from the President
arguing for military action. "Our credibility is at stake," he said. "The
dangers involved action is less than the danger resulting from inaction.
Creating a free and democratic nation is essential to America's security." It
sounds like some of the things we've been hearing from President Bush of late,
but this it was Lyndon Johnson, and the nation was Vietnam. <BR><BR>Daniel
Ellsberg, for one, believes we risk forgetting the lessons of that terrible war
as we consider the prospects of a new one in Iraq. We should add Mr. Ellsberg
has a new book out "Secrets, a Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers." We
are pleased to welcome him to the program. It's nice to see you. You are a
little hoarse tonight, so we'll bear with you. <BR><BR>I want to talk about
Vietnam and the papers for a bit. Did it ever occur to you that what you were
doing, as strongly as you believed it was right, might be wrong, that you might,
in fact, be doing great damage to the country? That ever hit your mind?
</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>ELLSBERG</B>: I read the papers. I knew
these documents. I was one of the first who read all of them. I'd worked for the
government for 15 years as a Marine and as a consultant and in the pentagon. I
knew these documents should have been made public to Congress and to the press
years before. And I knew I should have done it. </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>BROWN</B>: And you never thought that your
wisdom and your conscience, as sharp as you are and as good as you are, that
that judgment might be wrong? And that the judgment of five presidents and
countless secretaries of defense and the list goes on might, in fact, have had
the country's best interests in mind? </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>ELLSBERG</B>: First, of course, I can
always be wrong. I'm human just like those presidents. And I know I've been
wrong many times before, and I'll be wrong again. There's never been a time when
I was sure I was right, except that I felt pretty sure that I'd been wrong to
keep my mouth shut so long when Congress was being lied into a reckless gamble,
into an unnecessary war and a wrongful war. You know, I used to be asked that
question an awful lot right after the papers came out. That was 30 years ago.
"What gave you the right to make this decision on your own?" And I used to ask
myself, I wonder why I never got asked the question that I have to ask myself:
"What gave me the right to conceal that so long? What gave anyone in the
executive branch the right, when they knew that the country was being lied into
this war?" I don't think I was—I wasn't elected. But I didn't really take—I took
an oath to uphold the constitution, and what we were doing was clearly not
constitutional. </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>BROWN</B>: All right. Let's fast forward
and try and bring these two things together as much as they fit together. In
some ways they don't. There are lots of people who oppose the president's way
about doing this. But, at the same time—we've had him on this week in fact—who
will. . . </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>ELLSBERG</B>: You're talking about history
or today? </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>BROWN</B>: No, today. I'm sorry, today, in
talking about Iraq. </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>ELLSBERG</B>: It is very hard because I
feel that I'm waking up to the world I left 30 years ago. </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>BROWN</B>: But don't you—don't you see a
difference between a Vietnam of 1960 and an Iraq of today? They are not the
same, are they? </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>ELLSBERG</B>: Oh, no. Their language is
different; religion is different. There's lots of—actually, there are lots of
differences. For example. . . </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>BROWN</B>: No, but I mean the threat is
different. </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>ELLSBERG</B>: We are facing a very serious
threat today from al Qaeda. According to the CIA director, George Tenet, which
he—I give him credit for saying in an unclassified letter to Congress—he said
Saddam Hussein is a threat to his own people. He surely is. He is a tyrant. He's
even a monster, like a lot of others, but that doesn't excuse him. He is not a
threat to us unless he is attacked. He's not behind al Qaeda, as far as the CIA
can make out, and as far as the Senate Intelligence Committee can make out, and
statements to the contrary by Vice President Cheney and President Bush appear to
be without any basis. </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>BROWN</B>: We've got about a half a minute
left. Do you think there is—is it your view then that there is some hidden
agenda here? </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>ELLSBERG</B>: Well, I feel confident that
the reasons being given for this war by the President, the Vice President and
the Secretary of Defense, they can't be right. They're contradicted by
everything that comes out from the Senate Intelligence Committee, from the CIA
and so forth. So we have to look for other reasons. That's, by the way, part of
the job. That's what I did when I worked for presidents. They—the message of my
book and of the Pentagon Papers, unfortunately, is that officials, like me and
my bosses did, lie and conceal far more than any outsider can even imagine.
</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000>But there is another side to that. It's
possible to tell the truth. The message I would like to get to people inside
right now: if they feel that what the President and the Vice President and the
Secretary of Defense are saying is deceptive of the public, is not founded on
the evidence that they know passing across their desks or they know, by
expertise, I would like them to consider doing what I wish I'd done in 1964 and
1965, rather than waiting five years, as I did until 1969. They should consider
going to Congress and the press and telling the truth with documents. They
shouldn't do what I did, wait until the bombs are falling. That's why I think
the message in my book is urgent. So urgent, in fact, that I decided to put the
first chapter on the internet tonight on Ellsberg.net. You don't have to buy the
book to read that. That tells us what is happening right now. It's about the
week that Congress passed the first Tonkin Gulf Resolution, having now—this is
the time to read it, when they've just passed the second one. </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>BROWN</B>: Mr. Ellsberg, it's nice to meet
you. Thanks for coming in tonight. Good luck. </FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>ELLSBERG</B>: Thank you.
</FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>