<P>
<P> <B><I>Luke Weiger <lweiger@umich.edu></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<P>Justin wrote:<BR><BR>> Not what Carrol is saying.<BR><BR>Perhaps not. However, in light of the fact that he also shared this little<BR>anecdote<BR><BR>"We weren't about to defend a random murder by some drug dealer (regardless<BR>of who the victim was, cop or not a cop) -- but neither were we going to<BR>be put in a position of defending cops."<BR><BR>I think it's plausible to think that Carrol wouldn't mind defending a<BR>non-random murder by a lefty, </P>
<P>Why not ask him? But I think you are deliberately reading what he says in the least charitable way. And whether a non-random murder would be politically defensible really depends, no? After all, if the KPD had assassinated Hitler in 33, or some Left Oppositionsiy had murdered Stalin, the world world be a better place.</P>
<P>> This is a disturbing case about which there are serious doubts. In those<BR>> circumstances, those who share those doubts should<BR>> voice them. jks<BR><BR>Not at any venue.<BR><BR>-- Luke<BR></P>
<P>As I said; there's always a question about what points to raise when.</P>
<P>jks</P></BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Mail Plus</a> - Powerful. Affordable. <a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com">Sign up now</a>