<HTML>In a message dated 11/23/02 7:12:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, andie_nachgeborenen@yahoo.com writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">   DoreneFC@aol.com wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">In a message dated 11/23/02 12:22:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, furuhashi.1@osu.edu writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">And the indictment charges that Ms. Stewart allowed interpreter Mohammed Yousry and the sheik to pass messages in Arabic while she covered the exchange by chattering about inconsequential matters in English. </BLOCKQUOTE> Thanks. Sorry to be literal-minded, but I am still trying to figure out exactly what the interpreter is accused of doing. Maybe I can think of some places to look. DoreneC Probably conspiracy or aiding and abetting, that is, same thing as Stewart under accomplice liability. jks</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE> My question really is "what is the interpreter accused of doing differently than any other interpreter would do?" I downloaded the indictment from  www.lynnestewart.org and I have at least read it. The indictment and the Special Administrative Measures are clearly an assault on attorney-client privilege, but I see other issues for interpreters as well. Unless the rest of the list is dying for further commentary about what I read, I would rather continue conversations in private as people are interested. DoreneC </HTML>