Basra: The Geneva Conventions

Paul_A paul_a at igc.org
Tue Apr 1 18:48:26 PST 2003


Summary The entire city of Basra's water supply was cut last Friday (affecting some 1 million people). For a heavily populated third world city in the desert, no water (and thus also no sanitation with the resultant epidemics) can lead to tens of thousands of deaths. This is what happened in 1991 and coalition forces had given public assurances that they would cooperate with Red Cross and UN efforts to maintain civilian water supplies.

The water plant is outside the city and controlled by Coalition forces; until today access to restore the water supply was denied, even to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) international inspectors. Finally, apparently after behind the scenes protest by the Red Cross and the UN Secretary-General, limited access was given today to international Red Cross staff, but the inadequate nature access still leaves a very dangerous situation for the civilian population. The Geneva conventions require the US and UK to provide "rapid and unimpeded" access.

Details

(source: International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva - audio clip report of the ICRC head of Water and Habitat programmes in Iraq): http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/audio_iraq

1) On Friday the electrical supply was cut to the main pumping station for all of Basra, the Wafa' Al-Qaed, north of the city towards the international airport. This station pumps ALL of the water for the City of Basra, drawing it from the Tigris river; it also contains the largest of the 5 water treatment sub-plants. The pumping station was under the control of the Coalition Forces with no reports of fighting in the immediate area. Anticipating the disastrous humanitarian consequences of a power cut, the UN and ICRC had pre positioned 3 electrical generators at the plant. However access to the pumping station was not granted by coalition forces to startup the generators.

2) Over the weekend the ICRC was therefore obliged to hook up the four remaining treatment substations (under Iraqi control, in the city) to the Shaat al Arab a salinated industrial waterway providing an unclean sources of water and for only 30-40% of the population.

3) Since Friday the ICRC undertook "efforts" in Kuwait to obtain access. It should also be noted that for several days in his morning comments to reporters the UN Secretary General expressed, without specifics or naming parties, his concern over humanitarian access in the besieged cities. (source of latest and most subdued statement: http://www.un.org/apps/sg/offthecuff.asp?nid=405 ).

4) Today (Tuesday) limited access was granted to the ICRC so as to start the generators. But this limited access only permits the main treatment plant to operate at 60-70% of capacity [not the 90% reported by CNN] and even this is subject to the generators not stalling\breaking down. The Coalition has not permitted access to restore the main electrical hookup.

5) The Geneva Conventions require the US/UK to provide rapid and unimpeded access to these plants:

" The Parties to the conflict and each High Contracting Party shall allow and facilitate rapid and unimpeded passage of all relief consignments, equipment and personnel provided in accordance with this Section, even if such assistance is destined for the civilian population of the adverse Party."

[Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977. Art 70. Relief actions; para.2.]

6) The ICRC points out that should Baghdad also be besieged the same crisis could be reproduced. Of course it would be on a yet larger scale.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list