Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
>
> ***** _Blade Runner_...gives a double twist to the commonsense
> distinction between human and android. Man is a replicant who does
> not know it. Yet if this were all, the film would involve a
> simplistic reductionist notion that our self-experience _qua_ free
> 'human' agents is an illusion founded upon our ignorance of the
> causal nexus that regulates our lives. For that reason, one should
> supplement the former statement: it is only when, at the level of the
> enunciated content, I assume my replicant status, that, at the level
> of enunciation, I become a truly human subject. 'I am a replicant'
> is the statement of the subject in its purest....In short, the
> implicit thesis of _Blade Runner_ is that replicants are pure
> subjects precisely in so far as they experience the fact that every
> positive, substantial content, inclusive of the most intimate
> fantasies, is not 'their own' but already implanted.
>
> (Slavoj Zizek, "'The Thing That Thinks': The Kantian Background of
> the Noir Subject," _Shades of Noir: A Reader_, ed. Joan Copjec,
> London; New York: Verso, 1993) *****
> --
Is this a complicated way of saying "Freedom is the recognition of necessity?"
Carrol
> Yoshie
>
> * Calendar of Events in Columbus:
> <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html>
> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/>
> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/>
> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio>
> * Solidarity: <http://solidarity.igc.org/>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk