[lbo-talk] Re: what's permissible

[H. Curtiss Leung]

I'd agree with this.  I'd also say that an affirmative answer to the question
is a ploy to obscure discussions of means where a variety of them exist for 
a given end generally considered desirable.  None dare call it ideology? 


> 
> Is the whole question "do the ends justify the means" on too high a 
> level of abstaction? I tend to be suspicious of anyone who thinks the 
> question, so phrased, is answerable.  Don't you have to specify what end 
> and what means, or at least particular classes of ends and means before 
> the discussion becomes meaningful? Or is that too simplistic?
> 
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>