[lbo-talk] "Knee-Jerk Anti-Imperialism" Re: Two Takes
andie nachgeborenen
andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Sun Apr 13 18:03:28 PDT 2003
It's sure encouraging to know that people at Berkeley read so carefully. Every time I encounter something like this I marvel that I didn't get tenure at a good school. The standards are obviously not high. The quoted passage occurred as part of a paragraph _defending_ the United States' defense against attack in the Pacific war. I _expressly_ said (twice, since Shane also missed it!) that the war was imperialist but justified by just war theory, and that a victory for democratic imperialism was preferable to a victory for quasi-fascist Japonese imperialism. I pointed out that virtually all socialists at the time of every stripe felt the same way, and most of military age signed up to fight. Now we will see who is the next PhD who can't read. jks
Brad DeLong <delong at econ.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:>The war against Japan was an imperialist war plain and simple,
>between two imperiali powers;
China views it very differently. The near-genocide Japan perpetrated
on China during WWII approached (but did not match) what the Nazis
tried to do to the Russians. The Japanese fascist state was an
extremely ugly thing. I am surprised that so many people avert their
gaze from it.
Brad DeLong
___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20030413/11d3cafb/attachment.htm>
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list