On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 14:14:46 -0400 Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
writes:
> Nathan Newman wrote:
>
> >Which is why denouncing the Cuba repression is always timely, maybe
> more so
> >now.
>
> So you'd endorse a Bush admin humanitarian intervention in Cuba? How
>
> far would you go? Covert action? Full-blown invasion?
>
> Several times now I've asked all you folks how you'd defend any kind
>
> of progressive regime against U.S. hostility, and I've yet to hear
> an
> approximation of an answer. I'm guessing it's because you don't have
>
> one, but I won't give up hope yet.
I'm guessing that if push comes to shove, at least some of these folk would endorse a Bush admin humanitarian intervention. The rest might criticize Bush, but would claim such an intervention was largely Castro's ownf fault because he had failed to heed their warnings on the treatment of dissidents in Cuba. In other words, we are dealing with people, who are little different from the "State Department socialists" of days of yore.
Jim F.
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
________________________________________________________________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com