Jim F.
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 18:23:19 EDT BrownBingb at aol.com writes:
>
>
> > So those signing that letter are the ones who will be able to
> fight a Cuba
> > invasion if it comes to it-- not the folks being silent as gross
> human
> > rights violations and executions happen there.
> >
> > -- Nathan Newman
>
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> CB: The response from Cuba that was posted would tend to contradict
> your
> claim that these are gross human rights violations.
>
> You are taking an abstract and isolated view of freedom of speech
> unrelated
> to other human rights. In a word, and I don't mean this as name
> calling , but
> analytically, your approach is bourgeois-metaphysical . Human
> rights are a
> bundle , a whole. Economic rights are human rights too. Speech that
> tends to
> undermine economic democracy , i.e. might lead to restoration of
> capitalism,
> is itself a violation of human rights. The socialist and holistic
> conception
> of freedom of speech and all rights is that they involve not only
> rights, but
> responsibilities. What your conception comes down to is "license of
> speech"
> not "freedom of speech". Speech that tends to undermine other
> freedoms is
> not "free speech". "Free speech' is also "freeing speech:".
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
________________________________________________________________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com