>OK, Kells, now I'll mix it up with Steve some. I have no idea what I did
>to tick you off, btw, Kells. jks
you engage in logical fallacy. i have no respect for that. i also have no respect for someone who would prefer to claim that their interlocutor is angry. another tedious, nitwitted debate tactic.
now, you can start over and ask me why i was sneering, without trying to paint me as having a position that i don't have (and you don't have a basis on which to make that claim). or, you can fuck off. :) i have work to do.
kelley