Shane Taylor wrote:
>
>
> I think it's prudery. As in, "It's all so horrible, we have to be
> serious." Nonsense. Satire, parody, sarcasm, humor, wit, etc. -- all of
> these can trade in grim materials. Kubrick should have settled that
> decades ago.
>
You are speaking as though you know not only the inner psychic secrets of 10s of thousands, perhaps 100s of thousands, of people, over decades, but _also_ know the inner psychic secrets which they share in common.
Prove it.
I maintain that the claim is self-evidently absurd, and the burden of proof, an enormous empirical and analytic burden, is on those who would make a claim so absurd on the face of it.
Unless such proof can be provided, to make the claim is mere tomfoolery. + Carrol