> I don't understand how this idea is supposed to be
> patriarchical unless it is not reciprocal, i.e.,
> unless the idea is that a woman may not also go
> elsewhere if she isn't getting (ebough) sex from her
> husband,m or theright sort. Are you saying that if you
> don't get enough sex from your spouse, you should
> either forego it or get a divorce, regardless of the
> other costs, for example to the kids, and indeed the
> benefits of the relationship, which need not all be
> sexual? That sounds very rigid and Puritanical to me,
> bot at all like you, Kells. jks
Of course, another alternative is counseling. Or, if the couple in question has sufficient communication skills, sitting down and talking about it.
Jon Johanning // jjohanning at igc.org _____________________________ Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx