That would mean paying decent wages and treating service workers with dignity, rather than abolishing service work altogether, no? Denouncing that work because it furthers decadent life styles is moralizing.
PS. When I was in Mexico City I noticed that my left, pro-union friends employ a housekeeper, and elderly native woman to do their laundry and wash their dishes. When I expressed reservations, they replied that they: (1) give employment to someone who would otherwise be unemployable (2) by spending their money on that person's wages rather than on a dishwasher or laundry machinery they support the local economy rather than US manufacturers, and (3) they treat their housekeeper no different that other workers.
Rationalization? Perhaps. But its logic makes more sense than Ms. Ehrenreich's liberal guilt trip.
PS. PS. I love eating out. Does that make me a waiter-exploiting capitalist swine? What if I leave generous tips (as I usually do)?
Wojtek