[lbo-talk] Arianna v Arianna on 187

Eubulides paraconsistent at comcast.net
Tue Aug 19 10:25:38 PDT 2003


----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Henwood" <dhenwood at panix.com>


> <http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/>
>
> Nothing if Not Inconsistent
>
> A tale of two Lexis-captured CNN appearances by Arianna Huffington,
> discussing Proposition 187. First up, Nov. 3, 1994, just days before
> her then-husband was defeated by Dianne Feinstein for a U.S. Senate
> seat from California:
>
> "One-eighty-seven is strictly about the anger and the frustration of
> taxpayers, who work extremely hard, often having two jobs in one
> family, to take care of their families, to take care of their
> children. And then, their hard-earned money is being used to pay for
> taxpayer services for illegal immigrants. This is at the heart of
> 187. And if you try to portray it in any other way, you're missing
> the point."
>
> Now Aug. 12, 2003, just weeks before she will run for California
governor.
>
> "HUFFINGTON: Well, because Arnold Schwarzenegger is a Bush
> Republican. He is going to back the Bush economic policies all the
> way. He is for the tax cuts. He has Pete Wilson, for heaven's sake,
> chairing his campaign committee.
>
> "I mean, how insensitive can you be? The man who introduced
> Proposition 187 about illegal immigration into California and the man
> who is despised by Latinos, the very people Schwarzenegger needs. So
> there is some kind of disconnect between the moderate image and the
> reality. Incidentally, Schwarzenegger himself was in favor of 187.
>
> "PAUL BEGALA: But now did you support Proposition 187? Because I know
> that your husband did when he was in the Congress. He was running for
> the Senate.
>
> "HUFFINGTON: Yes, my ex-husband did. I voted against it."

===================

So, Reason magazine portrays her description of how others feel as indicative of her own opinion and then fails to conjure an inconsistency. What utter Clowns.

Ian



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list