[lbo-talk] Inverse relation between female employment and family size

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Thu Dec 11 23:28:27 PST 2003


[Or between practical feminism and family size. This is kind of interesting, especially when you add in other data points like the US and Germany, which both fit just where they ought to. Someone ought to tell the Germans they are actively going in the wrong direction if they want to increase the birthrate.]

Financial Times; Dec 10, 2003

Countries play the dating game to halt the baby blues

By David Turner

<snip>

The conventional explanation for the baby drought is a combination of economic growth and more women in the labour force. As women's earning opportunities increase, the decision to have children becomes a greater sacrifice. But that explanation no longer seems to fit the facts.

While Iceland's birth rate is the highest of any OECD European country bar Turkey, so too is its female employment rate. And although Italy's female employment rate is one of the lowest in the OECD it also has one of the lowest rates of reproduction.

Ingólfur Gislason of Iceland's gender equalities council says its high rate of female employment removes a barrier. "Even if you leave the labour market for a few years when your child is born, you can be pretty sure you'll be able to return."

Conversely, low employment can make the young reluctant to breed. Italy has an exceptionally high proportion of people in their mid- to late-20s who live with their parents, pushing up the average age at which they start reproducing.

Getting your economy back on track is not enough to correct this, say some experts, who believe it is no coincidence that some of the countries with the lowest birth rates are undergoing painful cultural transitions.

The average Italian man spends only 1hr 48min a day on childcare and other unpaid work - compared with 6hr and 24min for a woman in full-time paid work. Italian women who choose to have a child will have to shoulder most of the drudgery - and may think twice about having children.

<snip>

And on a different tack, but amusing in itself:

<quote>

In Japan, the cultural transition is even more marked. In 1955 two-thirds of couples met through arranged marriages. Now fewer than 10 per cent do, according to Naohiro Ogawa, demographer and economist at Tokyo's Nihon University: "Dating is fairly new to the culture." Observers wonder, only half in jest, whether the Japanese race will be the first to die out because it is too shy to reproduce.

<unquote>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list