[lbo-talk] Fw: [DemocraticLeft] Why Zizek Can Not Be Taken Seriously

R rhisiart at charter.net
Tue Dec 16 01:41:19 PST 2003


forwarded without comment from the "democraticleft" message board where it was posted by Leo Casey, NY teacher's union functionary, who is obviously not a Zizek fan.

R

----- Original Message ----- From: Leo Casey To: democraticleft at yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:57 AM Subject: [DemocraticLeft] Why Zizek Can Not Be Taken Seriously

Read the last paragraph of this New York Times article. This from the man who polemicizes on the need to return to Leninism, as Leninism's "total project" is indispensable to the revolutionary pose.

December 14, 2003: New York Times

Theory Is Finished By CHRISTOPHER SHEA

In April, the academic journal Critical Inquiry convened what it called an "intellectual town meeting" at the University of Chicago to debate a question that was weighing heavily on the minds of humanities professors across the country. Was it true, the journal wanted to know, that "the great era of theory" -- that is, literary and cultural theory -- "is now behind us"? In the 1970's and 80's, legions of students and professors in humanities departments embraced the view that the world was a "text" -- that the personal and political were shaped by language and that literary and cultural critics possessed tools as powerful as those of, say, political scientists for understanding the world and effecting social change. While outside observers have long inveighed against theory's abstruse argot and political pretensions, this year theory seems to have lost much of its cachet, even among its would-be defenders.

Several of the academic luminaries at the conference in Chicago challenged or minimized claims for theory's relevance. With considerable sarcasm, Henry Louis Gates Jr., the chairman of the African-American studies department at Harvard, announced: "I missed the day theory was politically transformative. I'm too young." Likewise, Mary Poovey, an English professor at New York University, conceded that thoughtful, methodical scholarship rarely has an immediate effect on politics, and counseled, "That's O.K."

Even Terry Eagleton, a former Oxford professor whose classic 1983 primer, "Literary Theory," introduced a generation of students to the field, broke ranks this year. In "After Theory," published in Britain in September, Eagleton recalls the thrilling early days when theory "seemed so obviously the herald to a new future, a land of boundless possibility." Yet now, he continues, "quietly spoken middle-class students huddle diligently in libraries," fancying themselves radical as they decode the political subtext of television shows.

Finally, in a move seemingly designed to underscore theory's frivolousness and political irrelevance, Slavoj Zizek, an ebullient star in the field, wrote theoretically inflected catalog copy for the "Back to School 2003" issue of the Abercrombie & Fitch Quarterly.

===== Leo Casey

-----The Democratic Left List----- To post message: DemocraticLeft at yahoogroups.com To subscribe: DemocraticLeft-subscribe at yahoogroups.com To unsubscribe: DemocraticLeft-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com To view messages on the web: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DemocraticLeft/messages

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list