[lbo-talk] more should be would be

Stephen Philion philion at hawaii.edu
Tue Dec 16 17:13:04 PST 2003

Previous message: [lbo-talk] was saddam, should be would be could be
Next message: [lbo-talk] more should be would be
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Search LBO-Talk Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort

Brian wrote: But the facts of Saddam's viciousness, depravity, and guilt are pretty well-established. Insistence on a trial, and belief in the guilt of the defendant, aren't mutually exclusive.

--why saddam and not the late great idi amin? or pinochet? or suharto? or our turkish murderers of kurds?

Previous message: [lbo-talk] was saddam, should be would be could be
Next message: [lbo-talk] more should be would be
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the lbo-talk mailing list