>Obviously, no one could possibly exact
>perfect justice for Saddam. His crimes are just too great.
>
>--are they really? help me out with which ones are so great that they merit
>a US sponsored court to deal with? If Dennis Halliday is to be believed,
>there is no small irony that it is Saddam who will be on trial...
>Then again, maybe you're right, if we push just hard enough, maybe we will
>get justice after all from this US sponsored court...and if we tap our heels
>hard enough, we might just get back to Kansas
>
Uh... Stephen, I've said that I'd want an international court, or an
Iraqi court, to try Saddam, and that a U.S. trial would be the least
desirable trial for the guy.
So why the _hell_ are you asking me to justify having a U.S.-sponsored court?