[lbo-talk] Dissident Marxism: Past Voices for Present Times

Chuck0 chuck at mutualaid.org
Tue Dec 23 11:07:57 PST 2003


Michael Pugliese wrote:


> http://www.dkrenton.co.uk/dissident.html

"Dissident Marxism argues that the roots of today's anti-capitalist movement can be found in the life and work of an earlier generation of socialist revolutionaries, including such inspiring figures as the Soviet poet Mayakovsky, the Marxist philosopher Karl Korsch, Communist historians Edward Thompson and Dona Torr, the Egyptian surrealist Georges Henein, American New Left economists Paul Baran and Paul Sweezy, advocates of Third World liberation including Walter Rodney and Samir Amin, Harry Braverman, the author of Labor and Monopoly Capital, and David Widgery, the journalist of the May '68 revolts."

Nope. They don't even get partial credit for this claim. This could be an interesting book, perhaps better than this blurb, but judging it on this blurb I have to laugh. Run the names of these people past anti-capitalist activists and you will draw blank looks.

If you want to trace the influence of socialist and Marxist ideas on the anti-capitalist movements, you'd be getting warmer if you brought up the Situationists and autonomist Marxists. The council communist movement and so on.

<< Chuck0 >>

Homepage -> http://chuck.mahost.org/ Infoshop.org -> http://www.infoshop.org/ Monumental Mistake (blog) -> http://chuck.mahost.org/weblog/index.php Practical Anarchy Online -> http://www.practicalanarchy.org/ Infoshop Portal -> http://portal.infoshop.org/ Infoshop Science -> http://science.infoshop.org/ AIM: AgentHelloKitty

If people eat their ballots, then that nut-case Stockwell Day will get in. Right-wingers aren't angst-ridden about voting. Don't we have to vote strategically, even if that means voting for the Liberals?

Having to decide between Tweedledum and Tweedledee -- that's not a choice -- that's a threat. Our electoral system favors a two-party race, and we should reject it. We have to start working towards a democratic system that doesn't force people to vote for the lesser of two evils (or the evil of two lessers). We can't keep jumping from election to election, voting for one moron because we're terrified that there's something worse. Now's the time to stop legitimizing this process and take a stand for fundamental, long-term change. It's more important to call attention to the farce of electoral politics than to split-hairs by choosing between Tweedledumb andTweedledee (or The Mad Hatter, the Queen of Hearts and the Doormouse for that matter).

- The Edible Ballot Society <http://edibleballot.tao.ca/faq.html>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list