Sycophancy, in my view, is a different trait than groupthink. Groupthink is the rigid adherence to a prevailing principle, whereas sycophancy is blind loyalty to a person regardless of any principles. Groupthink may lead to questionning of an authority figure if that figure deviates from the principle accepted by the group. Sycophancy will never question authority - it will abandon principles.
A good insight into this can be found in Else Frenkel-Brunswick, Parents and Childhood as Seen through the Interviews, in Adorno et al., _The Authoritarian Personality_ vol. 1. Frenkel-Brunswick argues that children raised by authoritarian parents learn that it is obedience to authority rather than sticking to pronciples that pays - and develop that trait in their personalities.
Wojtek
-----Original Message----- From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com] On Behalf Of Stannard67 at aol.com Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:54 AM To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Subject: Groupthink (Re: question for sociologists)
The tendency of subordinates to tell superiors what they wish to hear is one symptom of groupthink, which is more in the realm of organizational communication studies than sociology.
See:
http://choo.fis.utoronto.ca/FIS/Courses/LIS2149/Groupthink.html
stannard