ex-radicals?

[Marta Russell]

>At 04:54 PM 2/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>rhisiart at mail.earthlink.net wrote:
>
>
>what one can question is the nation's judgement in knowingly 
>employing and covering for writers who are such liars and 
>propagandists.    their extra curricular efforts aren't about issues 
>which the nation never treats.    so can one conclude the nation has 
>sacred cows, and writers whose biases the nation shares but lacks 
>the courage to publish?   yes.
>
>to use a cliche, i'd say the nation's behavior is socially irresponsible.
>
>R

I agree.  It has rejected any radical analysis of disablement.  I've 
had to go to the Socialist Register, Michael Albert at Znet, Alex at 
CounterPunch, Doug at LBO and other venues.

What they have published on disability is certainly sporadic (readers 
cannot get a handle on the issues like they can with gender and race 
and queer stuff) and lacking in socio-economic content.

Marta
--