But, moreover, it's manifestly untrue that the suicide bombing campaign has had good effects of thsi sort. On the contary, it has handed Sharon, a war criminal with blood up to his neck, two administrations and a mandate to do pretty much what he likes, a nd has totally marginalized the peace and negotiations party in Israel. The Intifadeh, when it was fairly peaceful (violence limited to stone throwing and the like), did put pressure on Israel to negotiate. And I don't see how any fair-minded pesron could object to Palestinian military attacks on the Israeli occupying forces, though whether these would be prudent would have be carefully assessed. But suicide bombings have been a strategic as well as a moral disaster.
jks
--- Luke Weiger <lweiger at umich.edu> wrote:
> Justin wrote:
>
>
> > Just a question for the curious: do you think
> > "martyrdom" or suicide bombing, whatever you want
> to
> > call it, is a morally acceptable and/or
> politically
> > prudent method of struggle?
> > jks
>
> This is actually a difficult question. Although the
> suicide bombing of the
> current intifada obviously lacks any redeeming
> merits, it is only because of
> the threat of future acts of Palestinian terrorism
> that Israel is at all
> inclined to negotiate, right?
>
> -- Luke
>
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com