Joint statement by SF organizers on the Lerner business

Michael Pugliese debsian at pacbell.net
Wed Feb 12 01:50:50 PST 2003


------- Forwarded message -------

From: DavidMcR at aol.com

To: asdnet at igc.topica.com, 107disc at yahoogroups.com, portside at egroups.com, socialistsunmoderated at debs.pinko.net, wrll at topica.com, wrlnc at yahoogroups.com, spnatcomlist at topica.com

Subject: [ASDnet] FYI: Lerner/ ANSWER

Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:33:55 EST

 

Dear Andrea,

 

I had been getting wind of this problem but had not wanted to comment, in part because some folks are willing to pick a fight with Workers World aka ANSWER when we should be focusing on Bush, and in part because the word I had been getting was muddlied - the writers referred to "Sunday, February 15" and this made it clear they were not in close touch.

 

However your letter does move me to write in dismay.

 

Freedom of speech within the movement is crucial - it is one of things many of us believe in (I don't think Workers World does, but again, that is my own position - show me a Leninist who believes in freedom of speech and I'll show you a Leninist who hasn't read the basic texts) and it separates us from Bush and his cronies, whom I KNOW do not believe in full exchange of views.

 

It is almost impossible to find a responsible movement leader who has not, at some point in the last ten years, voiced irritation at Workers World and its various fronts.

 

To conclude in advance that anyone who has had a harsh word to say about Workers World/IAC/ANSWER can't speak strikes me as, to put it mildy, a profoundly wrong position.

 

The point of our mobilization is NOT that we all agree to love one another. I detest much of the policies of ANSWER, I detest the subtle anti- Semitism of their courting of the Palestinians, and I detest their race- baiting, which I've experienced as part of the price one pays for disagreeing with them.

 

But I have, do, and will defend their right to be in a broad coalition (my problem is their tendency to control the coalitions). I have, AT NO POINT, advocated they be excluded. I would welcome Republicans, Democrats, etc., just as swiftly - and would be sort of stunned if I was told that "only speakers who had not disagreed with the Democrats or Republicans" can speak.

 

You have made a very serious error. What you all do later is up to you. Right now we need to build the coalitions here, there, and everywhere, and not allow the folly of the actions in the Bay Area to prevent us from mobilization.

 

 

We can learn from mistakes. It is also important to realize when serious mistakes have been made. In this case they were.

 

Peace and struggle,

 

David McReynolds

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Statement from SF event organizers re. Rabbi Lerner

Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:02:36 -0800

From: Andrea Buffa <andrea at globalexchange.org>

To: <ufp_com at yahoogroups.com>

Dear friends,

We are still trying to work things out with Michael Lerner. I hope to have more to say tomorrow. Until then, this statement at least clarifies what

actually happened. Feel free to forward it if you think it would be helpful.

More soon,

Andrea Buffa

_______________________________________________________________________

Bay Area United Against War € International A.N.S.W.E.R (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) € Not In Our Name € United for Peace and Justice

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT:

February 11, 2003 Bert Knorr (510) 644-8071

(415) 307-8028 (cell)

STATEMENT FROM FEB. 16 ANTI-WAR COALITIONS REGARDING RABBI MICHAEL LERNER

We would like to clarify the misunderstanding regarding Rabbi Michael

Lerner¹s perception that he was ³banned² from speaking at the peace rally. His charges are untrue, and we wish to set the record straight.

As the Bush Administration continues its relentless drive toward war, the

mass mobilizations in cities around the world on the weekend of Feb. 15- 16

have taken on great significance. Millions of people are expected to

demonstrate in cities around the world in what may be the last opportunity to stop a new war on Iraq before it starts.

In the San Francisco Bay Area, four coalitions - each comprised of many

organizations and individuals - have come together to sponsor a broad and

united anti-war march and rally on Sunday, Feb. 16. The four coalitions -

Bay Area United Against War, Not In Our Name project, United for Peace &

Justice, and the International A.N.S.W.E.R. (Act Now to Stop War & End

Racism) Coalition ­ have been working together successfully for the last

several weeks to maximize the turnout on Feb. 16.

One of the first agreements that was made between the groups organizing the Feb. 16 anti-war protest was that none of the coalitions would propose rally

speakers who had publicly attacked or worked to discredit one of the

coalition groups. When members of the Tikkun Community, who have actively

participated in the organizing meetings for Feb. 16, suggested to Bay Area United for Peace and Justice, that it propose Michael Lerner as a speaker,

it was explained by members of UFPJ that since he had publicly attacked

A.N.S.W.E.R in both the New York Times and Tikkun community email

newsletters, his inclusion in the program would violate the agreement among the Feb. 16 organizing groups.

It was this issue‹Michael Lerner¹s public attacks against one of the

anti-war coalitions‹that resulted in his not being formally proposed as a

speaker on Feb. 16; his views on Israel and Palestine had nothing to do with it. Within the anti-war movement, there is a wide spectrum of diverse and

opposing views regarding Israel and Palestine, and those views will be heard on Feb. 16. On that day, two rabbis, David Cooper and Pam Frydman- Baugh,

both of whose views are similar to those of Michael Lerner, will be

speaking. To reiterate, the fact that Michael Lerner was not invited to

speak on Feb. 16 was not the consequence of a veto by the A.N.S.W.E.R.

Coalition. None of the coalitions have veto power over the Feb. 16 program

We strongly abhor all forms of racism and bigotry, including anti- Semitism.

At the same time, we don¹t believe that criticism of Israeli government

policies should be labeled as anti-Semitism any more than criticism of U.S. government policy should be labeled as anti-American.

On the eve of a terrible war, we call upon everyone to join together in

making Feb. 15-16 a massive and powerful statement for peace and justice. We

are heartened by the broad range of participation that is developing for

Feb. 16, including within the Jewish community, and encourage one and all to

join with us in our efforts to stop the war on Iraq. >>

 

-- Michael Pugliese

"Without knowing that we knew nothing, we went on talking without listening to

each other. Sometimes we flattered and praised each other, understanding that

we would be flattered and praised in return. Other times we abused and shouted

at each other, as if we were in a madhouse." -Tolstoy



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list