At 08:00 AM 2/12/03 -0600, LouPaulsen wrote:
>Bryan, you should be arguing against Sawicky, not against ANSWER. Please
>acquaint yourself with the facts about February 15/16. In this case UFPJ
>issued the initial call for the action, NOT ANSWER. There is now a bloc of
>4 coalitions doing the action. You would presumably think it's a good
>thing. I think it's a good thing. ANSWER thinks it's a good thing.
>Sawicky thinks it's a bad thing - that UFPJ should have said 'this is our
>rally, go and have your own.'
>
>Lou