>At 10:47 AM -0500 2/12/03, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
>>>heh. heh. heh.
>>>
>>>http://squawk.ca/lbo-talk/0204/1053.html
>>
>>yowsa!
Just to be clear: that was NOT about Yoshie being willing to support Lerner but rather about her pragmatism in the past which she did not seem to evidence recently. See Justin's recent post. The tack taken here has been to vpretend that everyone who has posted is objecting on "free speech" grounds when, in fact, everyone except DP has been arguing that it's about a regretable position taken by ANSWER in the first place. Corn, et al are obviously assholes and the statement about unfitness of ANSWER was asinine.
Kelley