hunting and fishing

joanna bujes joanna.bujes at sun.com
Sat Feb 15 11:07:04 PST 2003


At 01:45 PM 02/14/2003 -0500, Gar wrote:
>When I lived in Texas, a couple I knew lived mostly by hunting and
>fishing and foraging - combined with casual labor. He hunted deer and
>quail and pheasants, and I suspect other game that was not entirely
>legal. He fished, and gathered wild roots and greens. They both
>gardened, and gathered firewood. (They had electricity and running
>water, but depended entirely on wood for heat. And they lived without
>air conditioning, which in the Houston area would have driven me out of
>state a lot sooner than I left.) They produced a lot of their own
>goods. But there is no way they could have lived on as little as they
>made without the supplemetation of hunting. Now I supposed they could
>have been all po-faced and mournful about it. "Oh what a pity that I
>have to take the lives of innocent animals to live." But in fact they
>enjoyed hunting and fishing, and great deal of the other stuff they did.
>And were in fact among the most cheerful people I knew. And really, why
>shouldn't they have taken as much joy in their livss as possible? How
>was this wrong?

I don't see how it's wrong. One of my earliest jobs was lab assistant for an ob/gyn research lab. Part of my job involved the collection of bovine uterine tissue (cow uteruses). In order to do this, I had go to the LA slaughterhouses and collect uteruses (after the cows were killed and during the process of butchering). I think if I were an animal, I would prefer to be hunted than killed at a slaughterhouse. The animals were brought in on trucks and corralled near the slaughterhouse before being killed. There were thousands and thousands of animals, waiting, smelling the blood and the fear and the death of the animals that had already been killed. The noises they made were unmistakably mournful and fearful. I don't think it was as easy a death as being suddenly shot, out of the blue, as in hunting. Also, when hunted, the animal actually has a fighting chance...to run, to hide: the territory is one he knows. At a slaughterhouse, the chances are all with the hunters; the animal can't run away.

As Gar says, you can choose to eat meat or not. I still do. But it's ridiculous to brand hunters as "barbaric" given our own practices. But "trophy" hunting is inexcusable.

Joanna



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list