>Martin, could you explain which aspect of Jihand you
>think deserves discussion and how it relates, if at
>all, to what I
>said about the UN/US police powers?
I guess that if you feel more comfortable discussing 'Jihand', that I needn't say much more about police powers.
If you think that you are talking about UN/US police powers then I guess that's what you're talking about. I thought that you were talking about post-invasion occupation of a foreign nation by a cartel that controls the US military, and that seemed to represent the bulk of discussion. It wasn't your comment that I was referring to, but the trend to consideration of Iraq at the expense of discussion of 'Jihand'.
Martin