Brenner on Lerner

[kelley]

this is NOT how you build a movement. engaging in the same tactics lerner 
did in order to discredit him and shun him out? this is exactly what pissed 
me off about lou's use of evidence available AFTER lerner was disinvited. 
(unless, of course, they were spying on him, in which case, they could have 
done everyone the favor of stating, bluntly, that lerner is out because of 
his political views. QED.)

you know what that says to me, this prick isn't to be trusted. no more and 
no less than lerner is. there is something at stake--too much at stake--if 
various people feel the need to defend WWP and ANSWER at any cost. this 
crap attacking lerner's person is what ComRod Cox always complains about. 
IT's not about issues or, if it is, those issues apparently can't sit 
unadorned because someone else's ego is at stake or needs to be bolstered 
by walking all over someone they've decided to have slamfest on.
'
principled discourse my furry, achin' ass.

kelley

At 03:04 PM 2/19/03 -0800, you wrote:

<snip idiotic ad hominem, childish, tit-for-tat crap>