>At 9:12 PM -0500 2/24/03, Doug Henwood wrote:
>>one of you Clark apologists
>
>That's a very courteous way of saying that there is nothing more to
>discuss on the matter.
It's neither courteous nor an assertion that there's nothing more to discuss. It was a provocatively phrased invitation to someone more sympathetic to Clark than I to provide some rationale that doesn't make him look like a naif or worse.
Doug