Is it any more utopian than the "grande soiree" of revolution in which we storm the Winter Palace and the morrow brings us a bright sunny socialist world?
You depict the anarchist initiatives (food not bombs, etc) as band-aid solutions to the poor, or perhaps some means of inspiring workers that a more egalitarian form of relations and exchange is possible. It is that. But is it too hard to imagine that such initiatives could grow to the point of being major spaces outside of capital? You would have medical care, production, etc that lies outside of the domain of capital. This would weaken capital. As I said earlier, the social centers in Italy are an embryonic form of this (as are some of the anarchist initiatives here, but the Italian social centers are somewhat more mature in development).
Why is it so hard to view such centers as part of a revolution that is already happening? Why cant capital be attacked that way...by deserting it, slowly, for sure, at first? Why do you see that marshalling the forces to do that is so much more difficult than storming the Winter Palace?
I am not saying that this is the only way "revolution" will happen, but it could be, is, one effective step.
Thomas
===== "Nothing is true, everything is permitted."
"Money eats quality and shits out quantity" -William Burroughs
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com