Deleuze & Guattari, Zizek on Arendt (More from Brennan)

[Grant Lee]

> The Brooks article brings up one example: objectively we can say all
>kinds of things about polarization and immobility in the U.S. income
> distribution - but it barely matters in politial discourse, despite
> having all kinds of "noneconomic" effects (ill health, depression,
> crime...).


> Doug

Jameson said something about the economic level being the only level of
analysis that bourgeois people would avoid.

As others (I think) have said here, social animals other than humans can and
do have relations of production but no one would necessarily say that _all_
social animals have culture.