As for Rev. Al: I tend to like what he's saying at the moment, and I do hope that he gives the Dems loads of heartburn in the primaries; but we've been here before with Jessie Jackson's 1988 campaign, and his chances of gaining the nomination are about as likely as snow falling in South Louisiana in March. He'd be much better IMHO if he ultimately runs as an Independent after the primary season is over. And he would have to reconcile the same tensions that ultimately killed the Jackson movement in the 80's (culturally conservative Blacks competing with culturally liberal whites; fellow -travelling within the Dems versus a truly independent movement, among others).
I agree with Doug on this one; Sharpton isn't perfect; but he's definitly no Rev. Dr. Greedygut.
Anthony
--
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:23:56
Nathan Newman wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Doug Henwood" <dhenwood at panix.com>
>>Sharpton is very smart, very quick, and knows what he's talking
>>about. Very impressive in interviews and debate (see the long
>>interview with Scott Sherman in a recent ish of Transition). There's
>>a lot that's questionable about his past - notably the Tawana Brawley
>>affair - but, hey, no one's perfect. I'm glad he's running and hope
>>he really shakes up American politics over the next year or two. He
>>could give the Dems real nightmares.
>
>We'll see how Donna Brazile does with her strategy to increase black power
>at the Dem convention AND head off Reverend Al. She's talking about
>reviving the tradition of "favorite sons", having prominent black
>personalities and officials run in the primaries in each state. The goal
>would be to sweep up enough votes to actually create a situtation where the
>"black bloc" of delegates would actually be able to decide the nomination.
>
>-- Nathan
>
>
>
>
_____________________________________________________________ Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus&ref=lmtplus