> > the tergiversation."
>
>Exactly, how does Buckley think that you have been guilty of waffling
>or equivocation?
Not that - in this sense (from Dictionary.com): "the act of abandoning a party or cause." I.e., turning on the POR and publishing a quasi-marxist newsletter.
> Now, I think that you have been guilty of that
>on occasion,
Hardly - just an appropriate recognition of the complexities and contradictions. And adherence to Driscoll's Law: knowing what questions to ask your answers.
Doug